<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Polar F11 Women&#8217;s Heart Rate Monitor Watch</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/</link>
	<description>Heart Rate Monitor Watches including Timex, Reebok, Polar, Garmin, and More</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:19:10 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Alejandro</title>
		<link>http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-6</link>
		<dc:creator>Alejandro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:12:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/#comment-6</guid>
		<description>I wasn&#039;t until I started using this watch that I realized that I was doing all my exercise wrong. Now with this watch I know I&#039;m doing the right amount of exercise.
Rating: 5 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wasn&#8217;t until I started using this watch that I realized that I was doing all my exercise wrong. Now with this watch I know I&#8217;m doing the right amount of exercise.<br />
Rating: 5 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Kasza</title>
		<link>http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-5</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Kasza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:22:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/#comment-5</guid>
		<description>The Polar F11 is reputed to be one of the better heart rate monitors. If that is true, I shudder to think what the lesser models must be like.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The biggest problem is the &quot;wrist unit&quot;, as Polar calls it, and the built-in receiver in particular. The signal sent by the transmitter on the chest strap is received just fine by most types of fitness equipment; yet the F11 is having a good day if it picks the signal up a third of the time. What remains is an ugly wristwatch for $150 -- and not a very good watch, either.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;A single drop onto a sharp corner will destroy the F11 wrist unit; Polar, probably knowing the utter absence of any sort of robustness, expressly excludes this condition from the warranty.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;But even if it is not broken _and_ having a good day, the F11 is loaded with junk. The &quot;OwnZone&quot; feature purporting to determine your optimal exercise intensity? You are better off listening to your breathing. The &quot;FitTest&quot;, claiming to produce a number comparable to your VO2max? Laughable. Even the backlight is ridiculous: You might as well buy a can of black spray paint and give the display a few good coats of paint; just as readable, and henceforth you won&#039;t have to press any buttons.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The transmitter and its chest strap are usable. Well, mostly.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Summing it up, the most obvious relationship between the F11 and your heart rate is that the price and crappiness of the former will raise the latter, even though the contraption won&#039;t be able to measure that.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The best I can say about the Polar F11 is that you don&#039;t have to buy one.
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Polar F11 is reputed to be one of the better heart rate monitors. If that is true, I shudder to think what the lesser models must be like.</p>
<p>The biggest problem is the &#8220;wrist unit&#8221;, as Polar calls it, and the built-in receiver in particular. The signal sent by the transmitter on the chest strap is received just fine by most types of fitness equipment; yet the F11 is having a good day if it picks the signal up a third of the time. What remains is an ugly wristwatch for $150 &#8212; and not a very good watch, either.</p>
<p>A single drop onto a sharp corner will destroy the F11 wrist unit; Polar, probably knowing the utter absence of any sort of robustness, expressly excludes this condition from the warranty.</p>
<p>But even if it is not broken _and_ having a good day, the F11 is loaded with junk. The &#8220;OwnZone&#8221; feature purporting to determine your optimal exercise intensity? You are better off listening to your breathing. The &#8220;FitTest&#8221;, claiming to produce a number comparable to your VO2max? Laughable. Even the backlight is ridiculous: You might as well buy a can of black spray paint and give the display a few good coats of paint; just as readable, and henceforth you won&#8217;t have to press any buttons.</p>
<p>The transmitter and its chest strap are usable. Well, mostly.</p>
<p>Summing it up, the most obvious relationship between the F11 and your heart rate is that the price and crappiness of the former will raise the latter, even though the contraption won&#8217;t be able to measure that.</p>
<p>The best I can say about the Polar F11 is that you don&#8217;t have to buy one.<br />
<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ted Arestad</title>
		<link>http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-4</link>
		<dc:creator>Ted Arestad</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:45:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/#comment-4</guid>
		<description>Watch is O/S, NO instructions on how to reset calories after work out even the MFR didn`t know how.
Rating: 3 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Watch is O/S, NO instructions on how to reset calories after work out even the MFR didn`t know how.<br />
Rating: 3 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Felix Kasza</title>
		<link>http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-3</link>
		<dc:creator>Felix Kasza</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 09:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/#comment-3</guid>
		<description>Polar F11: A cheap piece of junk, with a jewelry price tag.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The Polar F11 is reputed to be one of the better heart rate monitors. If that is true, I shudder to think what the lesser models must be like.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The biggest problem is the &quot;wrist unit&quot;, as Polar calls it, and the built-in receiver in particular. The signal sent by the transmitter on the chest strap is received just fine by most types of fitness equipment; yet the F11 is having a good day if it picks the signal up a third of the time. What remains is an ugly wristwatch for $150 -- and not a very good watch, either.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;A single drop onto a sharp corner will destroy the F11 wrist unit; Polar, probably knowing the utter absence of any sort of robustness, expressly excludes this condition from the warranty.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;But even if it is not broken _and_ having a good day, the F11 is loaded with junk. The &quot;OwnZone&quot; feature purporting to determine your optimal exercise intensity? You are better off listening to your breathing. The &quot;FitTest&quot;, claiming to produce a number comparable to your VO2max? Laughable. Even the backlight is ridiculous: You might as well buy a can of black spray paint and give the display a few good coats of paint; just as readable, and henceforth you won&#039;t have to press any buttons.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The transmitter and its chest strap are usable. Well, mostly.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;Summing it up, the most obvious relationship between the F11 and your heart rate is that the price and crappiness of the former will raise the latter, even though the contraption won&#039;t be able to measure that.
&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;The best I can say about the Polar F11 is that you don&#039;t have to buy one.
&lt;br /&gt;
Rating: 2 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Polar F11: A cheap piece of junk, with a jewelry price tag.</p>
<p>The Polar F11 is reputed to be one of the better heart rate monitors. If that is true, I shudder to think what the lesser models must be like.</p>
<p>The biggest problem is the &#8220;wrist unit&#8221;, as Polar calls it, and the built-in receiver in particular. The signal sent by the transmitter on the chest strap is received just fine by most types of fitness equipment; yet the F11 is having a good day if it picks the signal up a third of the time. What remains is an ugly wristwatch for $150 &#8212; and not a very good watch, either.</p>
<p>A single drop onto a sharp corner will destroy the F11 wrist unit; Polar, probably knowing the utter absence of any sort of robustness, expressly excludes this condition from the warranty.</p>
<p>But even if it is not broken _and_ having a good day, the F11 is loaded with junk. The &#8220;OwnZone&#8221; feature purporting to determine your optimal exercise intensity? You are better off listening to your breathing. The &#8220;FitTest&#8221;, claiming to produce a number comparable to your VO2max? Laughable. Even the backlight is ridiculous: You might as well buy a can of black spray paint and give the display a few good coats of paint; just as readable, and henceforth you won&#8217;t have to press any buttons.</p>
<p>The transmitter and its chest strap are usable. Well, mostly.</p>
<p>Summing it up, the most obvious relationship between the F11 and your heart rate is that the price and crappiness of the former will raise the latter, even though the contraption won&#8217;t be able to measure that.</p>
<p>The best I can say about the Polar F11 is that you don&#8217;t have to buy one.<br />
<br />
Rating: 2 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nestor M. Nieves</title>
		<link>http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/comment-page-1/#comment-2</link>
		<dc:creator>Nestor M. Nieves</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:15:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bestheartratemonitorwatch.com/2009/10/polar-f11-womens-heart-rate-monitor-watch/#comment-2</guid>
		<description>Very difficult to read, not what I was looking for, unable to return, never again I will buy anything on Amazon.
&lt;br /&gt;Not happy with the product 
Rating: 1 / 5</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very difficult to read, not what I was looking for, unable to return, never again I will buy anything on Amazon.<br />
<br />Not happy with the product<br />
Rating: 1 / 5</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
